Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Crooknose 2m
- SmokePotion 3m Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- Hivemind 15s
- Aquiline 11m
- Alex27 17s
- Rillem 3m Make it personal.
- Errant 8s
- Terrible_the_duck 58s
- MrRedgrave 33s
- Wulf 10m
- Vanashis 49m
- Euclid 1m
- Raven 1h I lost myself, in the dark charade.
a Mench 43m Doing a bit of everything.
- Pladdicus 27s uh
- PsycoticCone 16m
- BeforeTheWhispers 59s
- whatislove 4m reputation is whoever holds a bigger gun
- zxq 2m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- AntiqueBeast 6s
- MrFye 17s
And 23 more hiding and/or disguised
Sindomedome logo
a cyberpunk roleplaying game
banner art by Grand Failure
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now
  • BgBB
  • Ideas
  • stop
  • stop all automated actions with one command!

stop
stop all automated actions with one command!

Login to post. Membership required.
Jump To
Newest Post
Currently there's a whole slew of sub-commands to 'stop', including 'stop w' to stop walking (how come no 'stop a' to stop attacking?), but…

I would love to see 'stop' useable to simply stop all automated actions your character is doing, sort of a hard breaker to completely return manual control, or a way for newer players like myself to not spend thirty seconds trying to remember how to stop fighting (was it 'stop fight'? No..."Stop attack'? nope...uhm...'stop fighting'? nope....) in the middle of the spam inherent in automated fights.

By RedSteelButterfly at Aug 12, 2019, 3:31 PM | 0
+1
By JMo at Aug 12, 2019, 3:31 PM | 0
this is a good idea. if not stop then some other short one word command that makes me stop everything. Even stop all would be fine.
By Vera at Aug 12, 2019, 4:13 PM | 0
I agree.

At least a 'stop at' to stop attacking. And a corresponding 'stop ai' to stop aiming.

Is it too code / CPU intensive to do a partial string search?

By Hek at Aug 12, 2019, 4:48 PM | 0
While I agree that 'stop' to stop all actions would be amazing (+1 to this) 'stop att' already exists to stop attacking - Since some people are suggesting this. I don't think it's widely known (but it is listed on the helpfile).
By Kyrius00 at Aug 12, 2019, 4:50 PM | 0
Stop by itself stopping everything is a good idea plus one'd.
By kroack at Aug 12, 2019, 5:15 PM | 0
+10000 pleeeeease
By ynk at Aug 12, 2019, 5:17 PM | 0
Before this is implemented, you can work around this by making a ~stop macro that just stops everything (or just attack, if that's your thing)
By wiebman at Aug 12, 2019, 5:17 PM | 0
They've said that spammy macro's like that aren't allowed to me in the past..
By RheaGhe at Aug 12, 2019, 5:18 PM | 0
I would love for stop alone, by default, to just stop everything, and then possibly get granular with arguments.
By Marleen at Aug 13, 2019, 10:40 AM | 0
Bump because I still like this idea.
By kroack at Oct 2, 2019, 7:26 PM | 0
@Hek.

IIRC you can type 'stop att' to stop attacking now.

By Necronex666 at Oct 2, 2019, 8:11 PM | 0
Jump To Oldest Post