Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.

-	Fogchild1	15m
-	Crooknose	4m
-	SmokePotion	5m	Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
-	Hivemind	33s
-	Rillem	2m	Make it personal.
-	Errant	17m
-	MrRedgrave	13s
-	Vanashis	1h
-	Euclid	4s
-	Raven	3m	I lost myself, in the dark charade.
a	Mench	42m	Doing a bit of everything.
-	Pladdicus	4m	uh
-	whatislove	3m	reputation is whoever holds a bigger gun
-	zxq	8m	Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
-	AntiqueBeast	7s
And 28 more hiding and/or disguised

Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

Remove 'did you mean X username'
:)

Right now there's this current meta to use xto a, then xto b, then xto c etc etc to see a list of usernames in a channel.

I'd like it if the channel, when you do xto b instead of saying 'did you mean Bob or Bucky' to say 'there's more than one user with that name, please input their full name' instead to avoid people using it to just see a list of people on chat channels.

By Rangerkrauser at Sep 9, 2019, 11:00 AM | 0

big agree. right now, it's being used to bypass people who set @invis on @who, and it's not a good thing for people to be doing

By Dani at Sep 9, 2019, 11:01 AM | 0

Bumping because people are still using this to scan for who is in chat and get around the @invis option

By Dani at Nov 24, 2019, 6:06 AM | 0

There's a few bad examples who will 'to X' with a blank message to see if they're there, including players and GMs.

I'd certainly appreciate either a crackdown on people doing this or some code in place to remove the ability.

By HolyChrome at Nov 24, 2019, 6:15 AM | 0

This really needs to be fixed, yes.

By Pinklepop at Nov 24, 2019, 9:11 AM | 0

Agree. It's weird.

By Vera at Nov 24, 2019, 12:32 PM | 0

Resolved. See Game Improvements post for more info.

By Slither at Nov 30, 2019, 10:03 AM | 0

Edit BgBB Icon

Remove 'did you mean X username' :)

Remove 'did you mean X username'
:)