Reset Password
Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- deskoft 9m
- Wonderland 31s
- zxq 3m
- Napoleon 17s
- Sivartas 14s
- Slyter 2h
- Hivemind 38s
- Gragulon 14h
And 31 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ or just Play Now

Armoured Clothing
Armour is about as much Style as it is Protection

The title more-or-less says all: allow tailorable armours. If the fear is having difficulty identifying people are wearing armour... hold on, why is this an issue? Anyway, when you look, put [IT LOOKS ARMOURED] in between tags, perhaps even tie this to tailoring skill, meaning that having people trained in such would be useful to identify if someone is wearing armoured silks.

Why is this a good thing? Because, in the Cyberpunk genre, armour is often as much about utility as it is about fashion choice. The ability to custom make armour, with different triggers requiring different skills would be fun. What isn't fun is constantly seeing people wear the standard, default armours. It's boring and takes away from a more colorful game world.

I actually have been tossing around an idea for this that solves both these issues. Allow munitions-type characters to use a special machine like the sticker machine to make armor customization without the limitations of the sticker machine. That way, you can still tell who is wearing what, but it looks badass and personalized.
I remember bringing this up to Slither at either a townhall or maybe on OOC-Chat. At the risk of mangling the explanation since quite a lot of time has passed, the issue then was that unique armor pieces would create a lot of bloat in terms of what was loaded.

It's possible that is no longer the case, and having customized armor would definitely be awesome if it could be done in a way that wouldn't slow the game down overall.

The way that some other games do this sort of thing is fairly simple and codified. Here's how I could see it being done in SD:

Material X is good against guns, bad against bats, and poor against swords.

Material Y is poor against guns, great against swords, mediocre against blunt.

One material might be light and stiff, the other flexible and tough, a third heavy but heavily padded.

You have something like 3-5 materials available to let people play around with different weight, coverage and protection values.

You have a fixed number of slots it can cover depending on type of material, and there's some form of layering and/or stacking logic to allow sensible combinations that aren't going to be top end protection against everything. The actual visuals of the armor don't HAVE to perfectly match up, for example, you could say that there's armored padding under a three piece suit with kevlar panels, etc.

The most important details of all are:

1) The economics of the system are important, otherwise you invalidate all the existing armor in the game and incentivize literally everyone covered in one-off custom gear - thus the concern of DB bloat

2) It's tied to a skill that requires heavy investment of UE to make armor comparable to what's available on the market. This skill really should NOT be artistry. Armoring is more materials science than it is fashion design.

3) All designs are submitted to a GM approval queue to check for theme, immersion and balance. No armored monocle that covers your entire body in bulletproof armor. No kimono that's made from exoskeletal armor plating. No socks of +9 invuln saves of the falcon.


Clothes don't need GM approval and, if I wanted to, I could make a piece of clothing with ridiculously, theme-breaking description. I don't think it should need 'GM approval'. If there's a piece of armour, like with clothing, that doesn't fit, they can just message, edit, etc. I see no reason why armor would need any more steps than clothing, in terms of moderation.


Because clothing is clothing. Armor has serious impacts on mechanical gameplay. Imagine the look on your face the first time you shoot someone in a bathrobe and find out it's got Xo5 level protections. Yeah, not fun gameplay.

Sindome players discovering the wearable over thick items flag (2086, colorized):


Certain pieces of armor can be worn under clothing. Certain pieces of light armor *are* just pieces of clothing and there is no tell besides the text, at the very bottom, informing you their clothing is *armored*. In other words: this already happens. All you'd need to do is add an [ARMORED] tag, in a different, bright colour.

So, no, your thought that, for whatever reason, armour would all need admin approval isn't founded upon anything and if anything, you're directly criticizing armours already in the game -- armours *with* admin approval.

Qewy, I don't know why you're taking such an aggressive stance towards me over asking that new designs get GM approval. You act like this isn't a problem in the world of tailoring already, but we have the trashed items queue, and spending any amount of time in there you'll see something like 10-20% of all the stuff in the queue made misrepresenting the material it's made from or what's supposed to be possible with tailoring in the first place (see: props, jewelry, light-up clothing, etc.)

Then there's the issue of a good amount of tailored material in the queue just being very, very poor quality work, full of typos, not using pronoun switches, having entire blocks of messaging missing or using default messages.

Don't get me wrong, I totally support the idea of more armor = more gooder and that the game should be style over substance in a lot of cases. I'd love for there to be the ability to make armors, or for that matter, to give the ability to customize existing armors with your own personal battle damage or insignia. It's just that armor is a very powerful thing in the game, it's prone to abuse right now (see thugs wearing a mountain of junk over their armor so it's a humongous pain in the ass to remove) and that the proposal you've given is going to further allow for player abuse. Player abuse, which, has been a recent topic of discussion in the game and caused a number of balance changes in the past few months. Just something to consider.

Except you can put clothes over armor now, rather conveniently. Or just a poncho, which everyone does.

The idea that player abuse is the reasoning behind non-customization of armor is really a red herring, because any abuse that can happen can already happen. The reason it wasn't considered all the other times I asked about it, as I understand it, was that a piece of armor only takes one spot up in the database whereas any customized pieces would be a full additional duplication plus the custom strings.

I'm not for or against the idea, but I do think it should be a separate skill from tailoring. There is at least one tailoring application that requires more than tailoring to accomplish, either by having an additional skill, or by collaborating with another party that has that skill.

Also, I don't care if there is an indication that the item is armored unless it is so armored as to be noticable. Padding a three piece suit, for example, should be noticeable. It bloats the suit and makes it less attractive.

If you're going for a John Wick-esque type of insert though, not noticeable at all, but less protection and *suck on his teeth* "Quite painful, I'm afraid."

Also, the material costs should be comparable to existing armor.
I'm sort of against the idea of just randomly crafting armor from the stuff in the mall, because yes the idea of memory bloat would be a nightmare. If there is going to be a custom tailoring material that provides actual armor it should be extremely rare, whether through cost or actual rarity. 100k+ for a single bolt on Blue, the armored hide of the Akalumpa, that sort of thing.

I would like to +1 @Kalii's idea for a munition's machine (maybe even the item that works with armor already) that can alter the looks of pre-programmed armor. Maybe you could choose from a very limited list of colors, and you can tack on additional look to the armor, with the entire sentence being in that color. Better yet, if it could work on Skinwriter principles, you could have one short text that is added to the @worn descriptor for what people see when they look at someone, and a more explicit description when you look at the item itself.

-Look at Joe-

Joe Schmoe is wearing a neXus trenchcoat. <> There is an awesome looking snake painted on the back of it.

-Look at Coat-

((Descript of neXus trench)) <> Long description of awesome looking snake.

Also, I would like to take the idea further, and allow alterations of armor coverage. Are your pants too heavy for your tastes? Have your tailor/munition person turn them into some tactical Daisy Dukes. While there may not be enough material in a neXus coat, a tailor can probably figure out how to close it up. Though as like repair jobs, hopefully your tailor won't wreck your coat and weaken it in the process.

Bouncing off @RatchetEffect's idea though, having items such as composite carbon diamond alloys future-tech ballistic plates to add a little protection to tailored clothing would be kinda cool as well. Since the item has already been created, it shouldn't be hard to affect the variables already made. And as always, having a tailor on hand who can do this would now be an asset.

Just my 2c.


Because that would make it a far less useful ability. The issues, currently:

A. If you're a high-tier combat character, you *need* to be wearing armour at nearly all times. This can be excessively silly.

B. Armor is about style, in Cyberpunk.

C. Add GM approval to clothes. See how long approving each piece is going to take. The issue is it's insanely mistrustful, what staff consider acceptable varies, it leads to the ability to craft armour being less useful than just buying it off the shelf.

It would be the same issue with making it all excessively expensive. It'd make sense if, for example, it would be expensive *at first* whilst setting up a sort of armoury. But, afterwards, if the costs are higher than off-the-shelf, vanilla armour, and worse, then the question rises of: 'why bother?'

The current economy is *odd*. It's set up to heavily favour fixers. Often, aside from paying a little bit for style, using vanilla equipment is better. It takes away heavily from the Cyberpunk aesthetic. Where are all my neon, fiber-plated, street punk jackets and motorcycle helmets?

It would, if anything, also reduce on metagame knowledge. If you need tailor/munitions to be able to identify if clothing is armoured and to what degree, it'd put heavier emphasis on skills that have not-that-much coded support compared to combat stats.

Something we can both agree on Qewy, the economy as I have recently been referring to it as, is 'fucky.'

Your assessment that the economy is too reliant on fixers is a good one. And you're right in the fact that anyone who's put into a serious combat position, either by choice or by decision, gets to pretty much live in their armor. It's not great, and I remember it being something that used to bother me quite a bit when I was newer at the game, come to think of it.

The thing about custom, flash looking stuff is that every precedent in the game is set up such that if you want anything custom, flashy, style over substance or however else you want to put it, you are forced to farm insane amounts of chyen in order to acquire. Back before vehicle combat, take a look at cars. You had a bunch of coupe/sedans that could seat more or less 5 people. Some were cheap, some were comically expensive. The difference was entirely in the flex of being able to say 'yeah, I pissed away a whole lot of money for this, look at how big my e-ego is.'

The entire game is hand-catered to tailors as it is, unfortunately. We have a handful of shop clothing in each sector, all of which is ugly as hell and sucks, specifically so we're forced to dump money on people with a single skill. In the case of intense specialization, like an AV mechanic or a cybersurgeon, I think this kind of bottlenecking is ok, however, it's also the case with fashion.

Have you ever put in builder requests for redecoration or god forbid actual rennovations of a place? I have, and I can tell you that sometimes you're looking at upto well into the six figure range to get it done.

For this matter, why does tailored clothing even take damage in the first place? Repairs trash the value of the clothing, so why not have it simply disintegrate or go up in a huge conflagration when you get near a open flame? Do players not naturally die, lose, or grow tired of old clothing, just to drive more into the game system naturally? Of course.

The point that I'm trying to get at isn't one that I'm really proud to be making or something I'm going to shake my pom-poms about. Sindome isn't really a cyberpunk game. It is a game that wastes enormous amounts of player's time and energy grinding money that tends to last exceedingly short amounts of time. It wants you to then waste precious little spare money you get to look cool or fashionable. It's not themely to the cyberpunk genre at all when it comes to it's artistic and expressive design. It is a game that heavily favors people smashing skulls in over having arguments or debates over things, putting on fashion shows or music concerts. That said, for me personally, of all the non-combat related stuff in the game, this is probably just about in the dead last position for things to fix, or add upon.

I want more armors. I want more styles. I want not having to go to the same handful of people to spend every chyen my character earns on rebuying the exact same shit every single time I die. But artistry does not need to be the skill doing this, and there's a staggering amount of things that I'd prioritize over tailoring armor, or armorsmithing, whatever you'd like to call it. I mean, we still have archetypes that are staples of the genre that fundamentally don't work in SD because of a lack of coded support, dev time and ability. I'd do a backflip to see forensics or decking or some of the other less represented or outright meme-worthy skills to get some attention.

bumping this again because of relevant town hall talks.
Would love this. Would also just like more material options in general. And similar to the armored clothing thought, customisable masks.