Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- PinkFox 9m
- Hivemind 5m
- Bruhlicious 2m Deine Mutter stinkt nach Erbrochenem und Bier.
- Frozenpizza 56m
- Vanashis 2m
- zxq 1h Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- Rillem 16m Make it personal.
- Pladdicus 2m uh
- Sivartas 1h
- Fay 2s
And 16 more hiding and/or disguised

AI-generated writing IC
"On these neon streets in this dog-eat-dog city..."

I would rather read the crappiest grammar ever with the most glaring typos in the world, than subject my eyes to another AI-generated slop piece of "writing."

Y'all. It's obvious. And it pulls me and many other people out of our immersion. How can someone react ICly to a piece of text that a computer obviously wrote? It comes across as the player not having put any effort or thought into writing it, and it makes me less likely to want to engage with it.

Look, I know not all of us are the most confident writers in English. That's okay! I'd rather read something authentic than something clearly from an AI. Also, you can always hire a writer or journalist IC to write texts exactly to your specifications. But please just put even the slightest amount of effort into it. Use your own brain.

Agreed that I didn't come here to write with robots, but how can you tell something is AI? I don't use it, so I'm not familiar. Is it just word salad?
You develop a sense for it the more you see it. Some common "tells" are em dashes, "It's not X. It's Y." phrasing, as well as vague overly wordy descriptions that wouldn't make any sense for someone to write ICLY. For example, "On these cut-throat neon streets, a solo isn't just another murderer or anonymous shroud. He's an instigator of conflict."
Couldn't that just be style someone was trying to emulate? I dunno. Just worry about discouraging someone who actually worked hard on something. I use all those things myself sometimes in writing. The dashes allll the time - too much. ;)
I know not everyone is a fan of what I write either but being accused of being so bad I was using AI would be a super bummer.
But! I admit I'm not experienced with how ai works and it freaks me right the heck out. I will echo the sentiment that I want to write with people and if you don't want to write, please farm it out to someone else.

(Now Im going to go have a whole ass existential crisis.)

I use AI for a lot of things to make my life easier. It is flawed, but it generally hits the mark for a lot of research or structuring work and projects. Once you have used it enough you can 100% tell when something is AI generated. AI generation is awful for creative writing, especially when you are writing something detail oriented for something like Sindome.

I let ChatGPT respond to your post:

"I wouldn’t spiral over it.

A lot of the things people point to as “AI tells” are just common writing habits. Dashes, ellipses, layered description, certain rhythms of phrasing — those have all existed long before text generators. Style overlap doesn’t equal automation. It just means language has patterns, and people sometimes share them.

It’s also worth remembering that most experienced readers can usually tell the difference between someone engaged in a scene and something mechanically produced. AI writing tends to be oddly generic when you sit with it for a bit. It struggles with sustained voice, with continuity of emotion, with the small, messy human inconsistencies that make collaborative writing feel alive. If you’re actually present in the exchange — reacting, adapting, taking risks — that shows.

At the same time, it’s reasonable for communities to say they want human collaboration. That doesn’t have to be read as an accusation. It’s more about preserving the spirit of shared creativity than policing punctuation habits.

If you worked hard on something, that effort matters. Someone else’s anxiety about technology doesn’t invalidate that. And if anyone ever did question you, a calm, straightforward response is usually enough. People who are writing in good faith tend to recognize it in others.

No existential crisis required."

This paragraph here is something I would say is blatantly AI-generated. Especially the cliches and the listing things in threes.

"It struggles with sustained voice, with continuity of emotion, with the small, messy human inconsistencies that make collaborative writing feel alive. If you’re actually present in the exchange — reacting, adapting, taking risks — that shows."

I think I would caution people to assume that certain writing styles must be AI. It is trained on how real people write (although, yes, it is a highly-refined/averaged version of that). More importantly though, a lot of people spend a lot of time talking to AI and that is increasing all the time. The way that LLMs speak is going to feed back into us and kind of train us to talk similarly over time. Especially younger people I imagine will speak more like LLMs over time.

I do agree that we shouldn't be using them for RP and important IC content, but assuming that something is AI just because of writing style just doesn't sit well with me. Especially since topside players might actually be trying to write things that sound hyper-corporate which might come across similarly.

"I do agree that we shouldn't be using them for RP and important IC content, but assuming that something is AI just because of writing style just doesn't sit well with me. Especially since topside players might actually be trying to write things that sound hyper-corporate which might come across similarly."

AI recognition might not sit well with you, but it's reality. Even a moderately trained eye can spot it. I personally don't care, but if you choose to let something like ChatGPT write an article for you then you will end up with a lot of slop that will cause your audience to scratch their heads in confusion. At the very least just read it after it is generated and ask yourself if this makes sense to be in the writing. In the neon lighted streets of Sindome - where reputation is currency - it matters to a lot of people who will probably ignore your writing based upon the glaring AI fingerprint. Not saying it is right, not saying it is wrong.

I'd encourage people to steer clear of using AI to write things. You're robbing yourself of practice, skill sharpening, and the ability to dive deeper into your characters head.

Agreed it seems fairly obvious when something is AI written.

I use AI a lot for work and to make my life easier. Even to code. But if my goal is to sit down and enjoy some time coding, as opposed to needing to get something done so I can move on to do something I enjoy doing, I'm not using AI.

Using AI to write text in a text based game you enjoy playing is just robbing you of the enjoyment you'd get from doing it yourself. If you don't enjoy the writing, just don't do it. You don't need to. Pick a different IC job or a different style of game to play.

I have no issue with people who English is a second language for, writing in their own voice and sometimes getting things wrong. It's great practice for them and it gives the character a unique voice.

yeah i personally suck at creative writing but i will be long in the cold, cold ground before i let an LLM do it for me. you learn by doing
What's the recourse if we suspect that LLMs have been used for paid IC services? Like tailoring, or articles. I can't think of a single way to bring this up that doesn't foul the waters.
It's not really possible to policy that, more of people are asked to not do it. ICly you can always say you do not like the work and never use the tailor again.
And if the tailor superkills me because I ICly shorted them on a job…?
IC actions, ic consequences. You don't have to short them, just don't use them again.
I think we can all agree that asking the admin to police this is not going to work, because we have other stuff to do, and it's a very subjective thing anyway. If you want to give us a heads up, that's fine, but I don't want to hear complaints that we aren't doing enough to police it, or that it's 'obivous but the admin just let it happen'. Running the game is super time consuming already without adding more things to our plate.

That being said, you can simply not buy things from people you suspect are using AI to generate their clothing or whatever. That's completely fine. It applies social and economic pressure that can delete the core benefit of using AI for writing in a job scenario (quick money).

If you want some perspective on AI writing style, this is actually a really good read. It came across my Hacker News feed a month or two ago: I'm Kenyan. I don't write like ChatGPT. ChatGPT writes like me.