Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Fogchild1 12m
- Crooknose 1m
- SmokePotion 2m Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- Hivemind 5s
- Rillem 2s Make it personal.
- Errant 14m
- MrRedgrave 9s
- Vanashis 1h
- Euclid 3s
- Raven 45s I lost myself, in the dark charade.
a Mench 39m Doing a bit of everything.
- Pladdicus 1m uh
- whatislove 11s reputation is whoever holds a bigger gun
- zxq 5m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- AntiqueBeast 3s
And 27 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

The Great Chic Debate
Conflict between Attractiveness & Clothing scores

Continuing from https://www.sindome.org/bgbb/game-discussion/new-game-features/substance-from-yo-style–scoring-attire-320/#last

Background: Chic+ clothing score covers up attractiveness adjective, which causes conflicting goals of Charisma investment vs. Clothing Score investment.

Idea: What if the cover-up scaled per clothing level?

For example…

Well-dressed: Hides Good-looking adjective only.

Chic: Hides Attractive & Good-looking.

Whatever's 1 above Chic: Hides Winsome, Attractive & Good-looking

etc.

This way, your clothing score has to meet a threshold for disguising purposes, plus people who have invested UE into Charisma don't see their outward investment disappeared.

You are making assumptions about how these descriptors are arrayed in relation to each other that aren't necessarily true. Different characters also have different ability to tell things about clothing, so you may be short information.
What do you propose then?