Reset Password
Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Naya 2m
- Komira 1m
j Fengshui 11m
- BigLammo 3s
- QueenZombean 19s
- RougeHope 4s
- Gragulon 11m
- Bruhlicious 2h Deine Mutter stinkt nach Erbrochenem und Bier.
- Rillem 1m
- Napoleon 9s
- BitLittle 6m
- Sivartas 3s
- deskoft 1h
- zxq 31s
- adrognik 38s
- Lena 1h Yippee Ki-Yay
a Mench 1h Doing a bit of everything.
- Hivemind 1m
And 36 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ or just Play Now

The Great Chic Debate
Conflict between Attractiveness & Clothing scores

Continuing from

Background: Chic+ clothing score covers up attractiveness adjective, which causes conflicting goals of Charisma investment vs. Clothing Score investment.

Idea: What if the cover-up scaled per clothing level?

For example...

Well-dressed: Hides Good-looking adjective only.

Chic: Hides Attractive & Good-looking.

Whatever's 1 above Chic: Hides Winsome, Attractive & Good-looking


This way, your clothing score has to meet a threshold for disguising purposes, plus people who have invested UE into Charisma don't see their outward investment disappeared.

You are making assumptions about how these descriptors are arrayed in relation to each other that aren't necessarily true. Different characters also have different ability to tell things about clothing, so you may be short information.
What do you propose then?