Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- NightHollow 4m
a Mench 4m Doing a bit of everything.
- Sivartas 3m
- aethertm 1m
- Terrible_the_duck 9m
- Sulfurado 2m
- Balreskan 2m
- Vanashis 0s
- Acupa 13m
- zxq 3m Blackcastle was no ordinary prison.
a Kard 18m
- Pladdicus 4m uh
- Mikael 2h Per aspera ad astra
- Cword 57m
- Sambyotic 34s
And 22 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

The Great Chic Debate
Conflict between Attractiveness & Clothing scores

Continuing from https://www.sindome.org/bgbb/game-discussion/new-game-features/substance-from-yo-style–scoring-attire-320/#last

Background: Chic+ clothing score covers up attractiveness adjective, which causes conflicting goals of Charisma investment vs. Clothing Score investment.

Idea: What if the cover-up scaled per clothing level?

For example…

Well-dressed: Hides Good-looking adjective only.

Chic: Hides Attractive & Good-looking.

Whatever's 1 above Chic: Hides Winsome, Attractive & Good-looking

etc.

This way, your clothing score has to meet a threshold for disguising purposes, plus people who have invested UE into Charisma don't see their outward investment disappeared.

You are making assumptions about how these descriptors are arrayed in relation to each other that aren't necessarily true. Different characters also have different ability to tell things about clothing, so you may be short information.
What do you propose then?