Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- FluffyPuff 20s
- Hippo 1s
- Wulf 24s
- zxq 55s Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- whatislove 12s something witty here
- Rillem 1m Make it personal.
a Butako 7m https://i.imgur.com/GsU4a79.jpg
- AdamBlue9000 2m Rolling 526d6 damage against both of us.
- PinkFox 1h
- Vanashis 9m
- VermilionGrin 31m
- Mikael 12m No @invis-wow set
- Burgerwolf 47s PANCAKES
- Archangel212168 10s
- Fogchild1 3m
- Raven 2h I lost myself, in the dark charade.
a Mench 6h Doing a bit of everything.
- Pladdicus 23s uh
And 28 more hiding and/or disguised
Sindomedome logo
a cyberpunk roleplaying game
banner art by Grand Failure
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now
  • BgBB
  • Ideas
  • @check overload that shows teases
  • Because having to @check then @messages is weird

@check overload that shows teases
Because having to @check then @messages is weird

Login to post. Membership required.
Jump To
Newest Post
So I'd think a variant of @check with a similar interface too it, but which shows all of the clothes messages and the assorted information would be a good thing for tailors.

Something like an @check all "Sparkling Bedonged Vajazzled Diamondweave G-String Panties" would be a wonderful addition to the game. But maybe putting it in the form of a separate command might be better.

Any thoughts?

By RheaGhe at Jun 16, 2019, 11:07 AM | 0
I was thinking something like this, but simply adding the tease messages to the already existing list. I'd also like it if tease messages were able to be edited without refinishing the piece so they have more utility. In short you could use tailored clothing to store pre written messages that are relevant to your character at any given time or situation.
By Varolokkur at Jun 16, 2019, 11:11 AM | 0
Like Macros?
By Majere_Draven at Jun 16, 2019, 11:12 AM | 0
You mean @messages ?

By HolyChrome at Jun 16, 2019, 11:17 AM | 0
@messages is very poor at conveying the information, and doesn't include some of the other things that @check includes.
By RheaGhe at Jun 16, 2019, 11:25 AM | 0
Typically I just run @messages after I'm satisfied with @check to make sure everything's legit.

I can get behind the idea of adding the teases to the @check output if it's a line of code or something.

By Crooknose at Jun 16, 2019, 11:59 AM | 0
Jump To Oldest Post